When I Swallow There Are Clicking Noises: Help!

An ear, nose and throat doctor explains the causes of clicking sounds when you swallow and what can be done about this.
“Many people experience clicking in the ear when they swallow or chew,” says Dr. Stacey Silvers, MD, of Madison ENT & Facial Plastic Surgery in NYC, who is board certified in otolaryngology; one of her specialties is sinus surgery.
“The two main causes of this are the Eustachian tube and the temporal mandibular joint (TMJ).
“The Eustachian tube allows the middle ear to ‘breathe’ and function at the same atmospheric pressure that is in our environment.
“This tube ventilates the middle ear space and opens into the back of the nose.
“The act of breathing through the nose will allow air into the middle ear space through the Eustachian tube.
“This Eustachian tube opens and closes as needed to allow the correct pressure in the ears.
“The act of swallowing and chewing will help open this tube, as the palatal muscles are attached to the Eustachian tube.
“This is why chewing and swallowing are natural for us when we are landing on an airplane and the ears feel pain or pressure and we want them to pop.”
So what can cause the clicking noises when we swallow?
“If the mucous is thick that lines the Eustachian tube, associated with allergy or dehydration, then the tube can be sticky, not allowing good ventilation, and an appreciation of a sound when the tube opens and closes,” explains Dr. Silvers.
Solution for clicking noises when swallowing?
“Decongestants and proper hydration are usually the best treatment options for this.

Shutterstock/Phovoir
“Some people have a patulous Eustachian tube and the tube simply functions poorly.
“Clicking can also be the bones rubbing in the TMJ joint. Some people have TMJ pain while others just experience the noises as the joint can rub with jaw movements.
“This is similar to a clicking in the knee when walking. You may want to visit a TMJ specialist and consider jaw strengthening exercises.”
Pay attention to how you bite into very hard food.
A bout of clicking sounds can be triggered from repeatedly biting into hard blocks of chocolate, for instance, straining the TM joint.
If this article provided you with helpful information or reassurance, please consider supporting my work through Ko-fi. Donations help me continue writing detailed medical content that’s easy to understand.
An NYC expert in ear, nose and throat care, Dr. Silvers has been named among America’s Top Physicians and Surgeons in facial plastic surgery and otolaryngology numerous times since 2003. Dr. Silvers is an expert in the field of minimally invasive rhinology, resolving patients’ breathing and sinus problems with simple in-office procedures.
Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.
.
Top image: ©Lorra Garrick
Holding on Treadmill Side Rails while Running: Bad Idea

Putting your hands on the side rails of a treadmill while running or jogging will sabotage your efforts and waste your time.
If you hold onto the side rails of the treadmill while doing your running, you’ll want to seriously rethink this bad habit.
When I was a personal trainer people would tell me they need to hold on “for balance” or to “keep from falling off.”
One man, around 60, told me he did it to keep steady. The irony was that he’d set the speed at 6 mph!
This is pretty fast for someone who feels unsteady!
He’d been going to the gym for years, holding onto the treadmill’s side rails and “running” 6 mph – and during that entire time, his body remained the same chubby form.
If this sounds like you—locked in the same state, same body weight—despite months or years of running on a treadmill—and you’ve been holding onto the side rails (or the front bar, or the console), then here’s what you should do:
LET GO. If you think you’ll fly off, this means that the speed you’ve been using is way too fast.
“Holding the rails while running on the treadmill actually affects the natural running posture and alignment,” says D’Wan Carpenter, DO, a board certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physician with SIMEDHealth in FLA.
“It decreases efficiency of the body due to the lax posture allowing the core abdominal and back muscles to relax.
“This change in the natural alignment can also cause increased stress on other areas, and particularly places much of the body weight on the upper extremities, which are not designed to be able to effectively support the whole body.”
How to Solve the Unsteadiness Problem
The chubby man was afraid of losing his footing. I told him, “Set the speed at 4 mph and tell me if you feel unsteady.”
He began jogging, without holding on, at 4 mph, and was able to keep his balance just fine.
He also felt that he was getting a better aerobic workout than he had been getting at 6 mph and holding onto the rails.
Look at the woman in the photo above. Does this in any way simulate outdoor jogging?
Even a light handhold on the rails will compromise effectiveness. The type of hold doesn’t matter — be it palms only; wrapping the fingers around the rail; pressing only the fingers to the rail; bent arms; straight arms — this will create a fake jogging experience that will hold you back from progress.
When a person runs or jogs naturally, arms swinging, their core (the soft structures of the low back and abdominal region) works to coordinate the movement between the lower and upper body.
You may not feel this core engagement, but it’s there. That’s why competitive sprinters and even longer-distance specialists (400m, 800m, even 1,500m) have great abs!
Nobody rocks a six-pack like a sprinter! Think that’s from thousands of crunches? Think again. It’s from running! Note the abs of soccer players or any athlete who does a lot of running.
When you hold onto the side rails (or anywhere else) of a treadmill while running…you cancel out abdominal and low back engagement, plus short-change leg involvement.

What in the heck kind of jogging form is THIS? Don’t say it’s better than a sofa workout. If you have to compare this deranged form to sitting on a sofa in order to validate it, then you just made a comparison to an extremely low standard!
The abs and low back get a free ride when you hold on. If you’ve been jogging 5, 6 or 7 mph on a treadmill and holding on…and doing no outside running…and then one day you go outside to do some running…the fatigue will begin biting at you very quickly because your body won’t be used to running without holding onto anything for support.
What makes this habit even worse is when someone presses UP on the side rails while running. This literally subtracts body weight off the tread.
I’ve witnessed this to the extreme: an “air jog.” What are people thinking when they do this?
Their arms are locked straight, shoulders scrunched up, as they keep their feet partially lifted off the tread as they air jog.
“Holding the rails also decreases the amount of weight bearing and reduces the number of calories burned during the exercise,” says Dr. Carpenter.
The calorie readout is generated by the selected speed and incline, regardless of what the user is doing.
Break the Bad Habit of Holding onto the Treadmill’s Side Rails when Running
Set the machine to a slower speed and let go.
See if you truly fly off or topple backwards.
If you’re apprehensive, set the speed to 3 mph and trot it.
Gradually increase the speed as you adjust.
If you normally “run” at 6 mph and say, a 10 percent incline…while holding on…you’ll have to drastically reduce these settings in order to let go.

Shutterstock/Den4is
Don’t assume you’ll sacrifice workload by letting go at 2 mph and 10 percent incline or 6 mph and zero incline.
Trust me: A 2 mph trot at 10 percent incline will get your heart going, and you’ll feel your calves working like you’ve never felt before (holding on removes significant workload from the legs).
Experiment with different settings to find a sweet spot range…without holding on.
If dizziness is the issue, again, use a very slow speed at first and swing your arms.
Give your body a chance to overcome the dizziness.
If balance is the issue, again, go slow at first and give your body a chance to acquire better balance.
It will never learn to balance if you hold on.
A person who can deftly run down the street after a loose dog, chase their children in a park or run like the wind in a parking lot after a blowing $50 bill, did not pick up these skills by holding onto a treadmill.
Dr. Carpenter is one of the nation’s top board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, a national speaker, medical legal expert and independent medical examiner. She is founder and Chief Medical Officer of DJC Physical Medicine Consultants. Follow Dr. D’Wan on Twitter.
Lorra Garrick is a former personal trainer certified through the American Council on Exercise. At Bally Total Fitness she trained women and men of all ages for fat loss, muscle building, fitness and improved health.
Systolic Blood Pressure (Top Number) in Elderly: 150 vs. 140

Does it really make a difference if the systolic blood pressure in the elderly is around 150 vs. a little bit under 140?
The guidelines that systolic blood pressure should be below 140 are based on research that has, historically, targeted non-elderly people.
A report appears in Drugs & Aging, in which Leah Goeres, lead study author, points out that the goal of keeping the systolic blood pressure under 140 has been a longstanding protocol.
“Yet at the same time, there’s been some reservations among some doctors about how important this guideline is…in that, would 149 vs. 139 really make a difference in an elderly person?
“Keeping systolic blood pressure in older adults below 150 is important,” says Goeres in the paper. She says this is a “mild level of control.”
Then she adds that for the person over age 65, “that level is also good enough.”
After extensive analysis, Goeres maintains that more intensive blood pressure management, to keep it under 140, is not necessary for the older adult.
A potential side effect of drugs that lower blood pressure is orthostatic hypotension: Blood pressure quickly drops when someone rises from a chair, and this can cause passing out.
This problem is much more prevalent in people 80-plus.
The report explains that as men and women get older, the evidence becomes thinner that strict control of the systolic should continue to be very important.
Morton Tavel, MD, Clinical Professor Emeritus of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and author of “Health Tips, Myths and Tricks: A Physician’s Advice,” concurs with the study’s findings.
“As a practical matter, in someone over 70 years of age, I consider a systolic pressure of 150 acceptable.
“Although it is a bit more desirable to go even lower than this in this group, this is difficult to achieve in the elderly without the use of multiple drugs, which increase the likelihood of objectionable side effects.
“So it’s usually best to strike a happy compromise with a less aggressive approach.”

Dr. Tavel’s medical research includes over 125 publications, editorials and book reviews in peer-reviewed national medical journals. He was formerly director of the cardiac rehabilitation program at St. Vincent Hospital in Indiana. mortontavel.com
Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.
.
Top image: Shutterstock/ Alexander Raths
Source: sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141103142322.htm
Falling from a Standing Position to the Floor in the Elderly

A fall in an elderly person from standing to the ground is deadlier far more often than you may think.
“Slip-and-fall” accidents may be the fodder of reams of personal injury lawsuits, but for the elderly, they are serious business, and fatal significantly more often when compared to non-elderly people, says a study.
When an elderly person takes a fall from a standing position and hits the floor or ground, this can kill them, and if this worries you, don’t let anyone convince you your imagination is overactive.
My father thought my imagination was overactive when I kept expressing concerns about my mother (elderly) taking a fall due to her frequent blackouts while standing (severe orthostatic hypotension).
Well, one day it finally happened (because I wasn’t present to prevent it), and six weeks later, she paid the price in the form of a brain bleed that had to be surgically drained.
A report in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care stresses the seriousness of short falls in the elderly.
It seems like a no-brainer to say that elderly people are less likely to survive a short fall than are younger individuals.
But the elderly are three times more likely, says the study (over 57,000 patients), to die from a short fall than are people under age 70.
The report points out that short falls should not be underestimated in the elderly, and that about 30% of people over 65 suffer from a fall every year.
What makes the potential for death or permanent disability greater is if the person loses consciousness while standing, and then falls, obviously unable to help break the fall due to lack of awareness. This puts them at very high risk for head injury.
But short falls are still potentially very dangerous for fully conscious victims.
My aunt took a short fall, broke her hip, then succumbed to postsurgical pneumonia.
The study found that about 4.5 percent of elderly individuals died after a short (ground-level) fall, whereas the death figure for those under age 70 was 1.5 percent.
Of survivors, the elderly stayed in the hospital longer, and just 22 percent were able to function independently after discharge. The figure for people under 70 was 41 percent.
Nevertheless, almost 75 percent of elderly people are not severely injured from short falls.
Unfortunately, some elderly people think they’re in this 75 percent group and thus don’t take all the safety precautions they should.
Fall Prevention Tips in Your Home
“Fall-proof your home — remove rugs and obstacles at ground level,” says D’Wan Carpenter, MD, a board certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physician.
“Utilize assistive devices (walker, cane, crutches) and get instruction on proper use from a physical therapist.
“Have vision, hearing and balance assessments at least yearly.
“Get active. As people age they tend to decrease their activity and become sedentary which also increases risk for osteoporosis [brittle bones].”
Dr. Carpenter is one of the nation’s top board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, a national speaker, medical legal expert and independent medical examiner. She is founder and Chief Medical Officer of DJC Physical Medicine Consultants. Follow Dr. D’Wan on Twitter.
Lorra Garrick is a former personal trainer certified through the American Council on Exercise. At Bally Total Fitness she trained women and men of all ages for fat loss, muscle building, fitness and improved health.
.
Top image: Shutterstock/glenda
Source: sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101101130135.htm
If You’re a Slow Walker Will this Shorten Your Lifespan?

Slow walking in daily life may increase mortality risk in older people.
Years ago I worked in a department with many people over age 55. I confess: I had no tolerance for slow walkers, as they headed out of the department for lunch break, me stuck behind them in the narrow hall.
I was never ahead of them because my workstation was far from the exit, while theirs was much closer.
Getting stuck behind these slow walkers cost me time on my lunch break; when you have a 35 minute lunch break, every single minute counts.
Faster walking speed correlates to longer lifespan, says a report in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Though the JAMA study focuses on older adults, it stands to reason that if you want to be a brisk walker in older age, you should begin walking fast when you’re younger.
I’m flabbergasted at how so few younger adults have a perk in their step. I would tell even my younger personal-training clients to make a habit of walking at a quick pace in daily life, even if it was just a short distance from their parked car to the entrance of a store.
Walking Speed and Survival
Stephanie Studenski, MD, led the study of 34,485 adults over age 65.
The analyses, which covered many years, revealed that walking speed was associated with variations in the likelihood of survival at all ages in men and women, but was particularly correlative over age 75.
“Predicted years of remaining life for each sex and age increased as gait speed increased, with a gait speed of about 0.8 meters [2.6 feet]/second at the median [midpoint] life expectancy at most ages for both sexes,” says the report.
Another finding was that when survival was predicted based upon gender, age and walking speed, this was just as accurate as predicting mortality based upon gender, age, self-reported function, chronic conditions, blood pressure, smoking and body mass index.
Why does walking speed predict mortality?
The paper points out that walking requires energy and control of movement, imposing demands on various bodily systems.
A person who walks slowly may have damaged organs. (But I’m betting that slow older walkers were also slow when they were young. After all, do slow young walkers turn into fast older walkers?)
As a fitness expert, I propose an additional explanation: If you don’t use it you’ll lose it.
Nevertheless, at a minimum, making a habit of walking briskly in daily life will certainly make it easier for you to move fast when you have to.
You won’t get fatigued or feel exhausted after doing a lot of required fast walking if your body is already used to this.
Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.
.
Top image: ©Lorra Garrick
Actinic Keratosis Appearance vs. Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Actinic keratoses and squamous cell carcinoma can look similar; in fact, an actinic keratosis can turn into a squamous cell carcinoma.
Some doctors even believe they are one and the same, just at different points along the continuum.
Squamous cell carcinoma is the second-most common skin cancer. About 3,500 people in the U.S. die from it every year.
This skin malignancy grows slowly, but the deadliness lies in the delayed diagnosis.
The delay means that five percent of squamous cell carcinoma spreads, and this is what makes it lethal. As it grows locally, the destruction can become quite gruesome.
How common is squamous cell carcinoma?
Every year in the U.S. there are 250,000 new cases. Though this disease is strongly tied to sunlight exposure and usually grows in heavily exposed areas to the sun such as the face, scalp and limbs, it can actually grow in dark areas such as under the tongue.
Skilled Mimicker of Normal Aging Skin
Squamous cell carcinoma often initially masquerades as what many people might pass off as benign aging of the skin.
People may see that slowly developing dark pink, scaly patch of skin as a harmless consequence of getting older, or even harmless sun damage or the non-cancerous but abnormal actinic keratosis.
The individual may end up completely ignoring the stealthy growth, becoming desensitized to it, especially if he or she has already been diagnosed with similar-looking benign growths. Skin cancer never enters their minds.
The diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma is on the rise in people under 45.
What Squamous Cell Carcinoma Looks Like
- Patchy area of skin, reddish or pink in color.
- Often scaly and/or crusty. The crust may be some shade of brown or brownish yellow.
- May also take the form of unsightly nodules or very raised bumps, sometimes with a horn-like structure sticking out of them.
- If growth is allowed to progress enough, the area can become quite “gross” in appearance.
Actinic keratosis (below), which is very common, results from sun damage, and if left untreated, 5-10 percent of these morph into squamous cell carcinoma.

Shutterstock/Dermatology11
I asked Jason Lupton, MD, how a doctor can tell the difference between actinic keratosis (which many people have but don’t realize it) and early squamous cell carcinoma.
Dr. Lupton is a board certified dermatologist practicing in the San Diego, CA area.
Dr. Lupton: Sometimes it is hard to distinguish between AK and early SCC. This is sometimes determined by response to treatment — if a lesion responds to basic treatment — liquid nitrogen or topical therapies — then a further pursuit is unnecessary.
If it does not, then the lesion is biopsied to determine if it has changed over into a squamous cell carcinoma.
Typically SCC’s feel more pronounced, a little bumpier, rougher and bleed more easily and are just more “hearty” lesions — although again, this is not exact.
A squamous cell carcinoma is also more likely to be tender or feel — to the fingertips — as though it has some substance beneath it.
Can squamous cell carcinoma develop from a mole?
I have never heard of an SCC developing from a mole. It derives from the squamous epithelium. They are different entities.
Since squamous cell carcinoma is tied to sun exposure, how is it that it can develop inside the mouth or anus?
SCC is related to sunlight exposure, but in those other areas it is associated with preceding HPV infections. So sunlight is not everything with this type.
If you suspect you have only an actinic keratosis, you should see a dermatologist just to be sure.
To prevent this from morphing into squamous cell carcinoma, your doctor will spray it with liquid nitrogen (cryotherapy) which should kill the atypical cells.
If there’s no response, a prescription cream can be applied.
Dr. Lupton specializes in skin cancer prevention and treatment plus minimally invasive cosmetic procedures including mole removal, skin rejuvenation, wrinkle reduction and acne treatment.
Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.
DVT Treatment: Blood Thinner vs. Removal with a Catheter
Which is better for DVT treatment: a blood thinner drug or catheter-based removal?
A Temple University School of Medicine study involving 90,000 patients has an interesting conclusion.
The mortality rate between the two DVT treatments is the same. However, the catheter procedure brings more risk of bleeding.
This, however, is not related to the efficacy of the catheter treatment as far as removing the blood clot.
What is the catheter-based treatment for deep vein thrombosis?
This minimally invasive procedure involves catheter insertion through veins to deliver a clot-busting drug right at the site of the DVT.
This procedure costs more than anticoagulant therapy (blood thinner) and requires more days in the hospital.
Within 30 days of diagnosis, about six percent of patients with a DVT die.
In these cases, the blood clot breaks loose and travels to the lung (where it’s now known as a pulmonary embolism), cutting off oxygen supply.
Despite 90,000 cases being involved in this research, it was considered too small for any rock-solid conclusions to be drawn regarding the safety of the catheter-based therapy vs. anticoagulants alone for the DVT treatment.
Blood Thinning Drugs
The study might have you wondering about the use of blood thinning drugs for treating a DVT that’s already present.
“Blood thinners (anticoagulants) prevent formation of a new clot; they do not dissolve the clot,” points out Dr. Paramjit “Romi” Chopra, MD, founder of the Midwest Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapies (MIMIT), an interventional radiology and endovascular therapy practice.
“Catheter directed thrombolysis (removal of clot) is required in cases where the clot burden is extensive and the body’s natural mechanisms cannot dissolve it.
“We want to avoid chronic DVT and the post-phlebitic syndrome.”
Catheter-directed thrombolysis (thrombolysis = breaking up a blood clot) leads to a big reduction in the chances of developing this post-thrombotic or phebitic syndrome, an often debilitating condition of the legs.
PTS, a painful condition, is more likely to occur in patients for whom the clot occurs above knee level, particularly in the hip and groin area.
The American College of Chest Surgeons favors drugs alone, while the American Heart Association favors the catheter procedure — at least for people at low risk for bleeding.
Dr. Chopra
combines his Eastern roots and 30+ years’ Western experience to unify the best of both worlds at MIMIT to treat venous disease, peripheral artery disease and musculoskeletal disease.
Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.
.
Top image: James Heilman, MD, CreativeCommons
Source: sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140721182031.htm
Strip Off Belly Fat: Cardio Exercise or Lifting Weights?

If you want to lose stomach fat and had to choose between cardio or lifting weights, which should you choose?
According to a Duke University Medical Center study, cardio wins for reducing belly size. But there’s probably a huge catch — which I’ll get to shortly.
The fatty tissue at issue here is that of visceral and liver; it’s deep within your abdominal cavity and raises the risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes.
“Our study sought to identify the most effective form of exercise to get rid of that unhealthy fat,” says Duke University exercise physiologist Cris Slentz, Ph.D., the study’s lead author, in the report.
The study showed that to lose stomach fat, aerobics was actually more effective than lifting weights.
Lifting weights (strength training), according to the study, resulted in no significant results for midsection shrinkage.
Surprisingly, a combination of cardio and weight lifting to lose stomach fat didn’t make much of a difference when compared to just the cardio alone.
Slentz explains, “Resistance training is great for improving strength and increasing lean body mass, but if you are overweight, and you want to lose belly fat, aerobic exercise is the better choice because it burns more calories.”
These results beg the question: What KIND of strength training did the subjects undergo?
The study summary doesn’t mention this. However, what’s really telling is that the subjects were overweight and sedentary.
This tells me that they most likely performed single-joint, “isolation” exercises at submaximal intensity — perhaps at the moderate level range of effort.
In short, it is extremely unlikely that out-of-shape, inactive people, who have no experience with lifting weights, did intense sets of deadlifts, barbell squats and bench presses for a stomach weight loss study.
For the Duke study, there were three groups: cardio, weight lifting, and a combination.
The cardio group did the equivalent of 12 miles of jogging a week, 80 percent max heart rate. The weight lifting group did three sets of 8-12 repetitions, three times a week.
To lose stomach fat: the big questions:
- Were these sets taken to muscle failure?
- Or even near muscle failure?
- Or were the sets only of moderate challenge?
- Did they use light, medium or heavy resistance?
- How much rest was taken in between sets?
- Were these triceps kickbacks or barbell presses?
- Arm curls or lat pull-downs?
There are many possibilities here, and all influence how many calories are burned – during, and after, the workouts.
Was the strength training intense enough to keep resting metabolic rate elevated for hours after the workout?
Was the weight lifting protocol conducive to elevating the body’s release of human growth hormone and testosterone – two very powerful fat-burning chemicals? Something tells me a big fat “No.”
To lose stomach fat, strength training with compound routines, done intensely, will blast off more stored energy than cardio that equates to 12 miles of jogging a week at 80 percent max heart rate.

Freepik.com/pressfoto
Intense weight lifting, focusing on the “big lifts” like squats, leg presses, deadlifts, chest presses, pull-ups and rows, will burn significant amounts of stomach fat (and blub all over).

George Stepanek, CreativeCommons
I have seen this in my own clients. So what should be the final verdict when it comes to how to best lose stomach fat?
To lose stomach fat in the most effective way, do both cardio and lifting weights.
But if you’re a novice at strength training, I don’t recommend you attempt heavy, intense deadlifts or heavy squats.
A beginner who wishes to lose stomach fat needs to build up some conditioning and joint integrity before tackling intense, heavy compound routines.

Jasminko Ibrakovic
So to lose stomach fat, begin your journey by doing compound routines with light weights.
To lose stomach fat most successfully, increase weight as you get stronger and keep pushing.
Add cardio to that and you have a winning combination to lose stomach fat.
Lorra Garrick is a former personal trainer certified through the American Council on Exercise. At Bally Total Fitness she trained women and men of all ages for fat loss, muscle building, fitness and improved health.
.
Top image: Shutterstock/Sinelev
Fat-Burning Cardio Exercises You Can Do with Sprained Ankle

Don’t let a sprained ankle stop you from doing cardio exercise that burns fat.
First of all, make sure your sprained ankle is only that; no broken bones.
Make sure it is securely stabilized with a compression bandage. Compression bandages expedite healing of this injury.
Obviously, the cardio exercise that comes to mind for people with sprained ankles is the stationary bike, but there are other cardio modalities as well, and I’ll get to those shortly.
I’m a former personal trainer who’s had her share of sprained ankles.
I never let my sprained ankles stop me from doing aerobic exercise, and you shouldn’t either.
Pedaling Machines: Do HIIT
When using the stationary bike, if possible, strap both feet into the pedals, and employ a fat-burning technique known as high intensity interval training.
It’s possible to use an elliptical machine while recovering from an injured ankle — but keep the injured foot flat on the pedal pad at all times. Again, employ the fat-burning technique of HIIT.

The elliptical machine. Freepik.com/jcomp
Note: If at any time, a cardio routine starts aggravating your sprained ankle, stop the exercise.
The cardio exercises mentioned in this article have the potential to allow you to work out, without aggravating your injured foot.
Another fat-burning, cardio-based exercise you can do without compromising your ankle is that of standing in place and socking away at a heavy bag.
Make sure your ankle is securely taped and, ideally, in a brace. Of course, stop if your foot begins hurting.

Shutterstock/Dmitry Kalinovsky
If you know how to deliver punches, believe me, this will definitely count as cardio exercise and burn fat: hooks, crosses and uppercuts, as hard as you can and/or as quickly as you can, will elevate the heart rate and burn fat.
Ever see people sitting on the floor in a machine and rowing? This is safe for sprained ankles and will have a cardio effect.

Cardio rowing machine. Freepik.com/pressfoto
Rowing machines have adjustable settings; find the settings that will get your heart really pumping and your breathing going, and this will burn fat.
“Pedaling and rowing with a taped/braced ankle is safe, as long as the individual knows to exercise up to his/her tolerance level,” says Dr. Bruce Pinker, DPM, who specializes in sports medicine and surgery of the foot and ankle.
“Meaning, if the ankle becomes painful, he/she may need to slow down or stop.”
Always ice your sprained ankle after any kind of workout, and for a total of three or four times a day, 20 minutes maximum.
And remember, if there is any pain while exercising, stop immediately.
Dr. Pinker is with Progressive Foot Care, which provides state-of-the-art, full diagnostic testing and treatment of the foot. He’s a professional foot and ankle health and wellness speaker who delivers many original seminars annually such as “Keep On Running.”
Lorra Garrick is a former personal trainer certified through the American Council on Exercise. At Bally Total Fitness she trained women and men of all ages for fat loss, muscle building, fitness and improved health.
Top image: Shutterstock/fongbeerredhot
Best Organic Chocolate Milk: Promised Land, Horizon or Organic Valley?

Which brand of organic chocolate milk tastes the best? There are three popular “natural” brands that are sold at Whole Foods.
One is Horizon Organic. One is Organic Valley. And the other is Promised Land Midnight Chocolate Reduced Fat 2 % Milk.
However, there is no organic label on the Promised Land milk, but I’m including it here because they use hormone-free cows.
By far, the best tasting of these milks is the Promised Land. I am not kidding.
Both Horizon Organic and Organic Valley (at least the reduced fat varieties; I didn’t try the full fat varieties) leave a very unpleasant aftertaste.
The milk comes in a carton for these two brands, and I had briefly speculated that perhaps the milk was picking up some cardboard residue from the carton, causing the miserable aftertaste.
But if this is true, then how come I never detect any aftertaste in white milk by the same brands?
So I ruled out the carton. It’s the chocolate milk itself. The initial taste is okay. Nothing great. And then the aftertaste hits you.
Now, when you drink the Promised Land Midnight Chocolate, WOW! The flavor is much richer than the Organic Valley and Horizon Organic.
There is just no comparison. In fact, Organic Valley and Horizon Organic taste identical, both having the same aftertaste.
Promised Land Midnight Chocolate was previously sold in glass bottles, and now the bottles are plastic, and I’m telling you, THIS is the chocolate milk for health-conscious people.
Though it’s not organic, it’s still hormone free, and besides, if you’re hell-bent on drinking only organic chocolate milk, you just won’t get the same cocoa flavor experience with the organic brands, and the aftertaste is a complete turn-off.
It wasn’t a bad batch, either, because I purchased both cartooned brands on several occasions, initially thinking it’s just a bad batch. But each time, that aftertaste was there. Forget it.
The interesting thing about Promised Land is that their 2 percent variety actually tastes more chocolaty than the full fat version.
If you’re a true chocoholic like me, you’ll want to add chocolate syrup to the Promised Land Midnight chocolate milk, and Whole Foods sells organic chocolate syrup.
Go one step further and add chocolate ice cream! Now THAT’S a REAL chocolate milkshake!
While I’m at it, Promised Land Midnight also beats the taste of conventional chocolate milks sold at regular grocery stores, hands down.










