Hamstring Curls Lying Down: Proper Techniques for Best Results

There are a few ways you can tweak the way you do hamstring curls, that will yield better and faster results, be they fat burning, stronger legs or rock-hard hams. (more…)

If Cannabis Cures Cancer, Why Do Pot Smokers Get Cancer ?

Many cancer patients use “medical marijuana” to treat pain but die of cancer anyways.

And if weed can cure cancer, you’d think that daily pot smokers would never get the disease – even recreational users. (more…)

My Estranged Sister Didn’t Tell Me She Had Breast Cancer

Does a woman who hates her sister owe it to her to reveal a breast cancer diagnosis, since family history is a major risk factor for this disease?

• What is the right thing to do?

• Or to put it another way, the Christian thing to do?

• What is the moral thing to do?

Would it be to withhold the breast cancer diagnosis from the estranged sister?

Assume that withholding the news has NOTHING to do with fearing that the estranged sister will blab it to the whole world.

Assume that the woman with breast cancer won’t tell her estranged sister because, at a minimum, she just doesn’t care for her sibling.

It would be honorable to put aside the hate and hostility, if it’s actually to that degree, and just tell her.

This way she knows she now has an added risk factor, and it may influence her breast cancer surveillance program.

But what if a woman tells three siblings, none of whom she’s ever been close to, at the time of diagnosis, but then doesn’t tell the fourth sibling — a woman — until 13 months later?

This actually happened to me.

My sister and I have never been friends. However, she was never friends with the other three siblings, either. Not all families operate like “The Waltons” or “The Brady Bunch.”

So why was I the “odd man” out?

Some Facts to Consider

I would have understood my estranged sister’s decision not to reveal her breast cancer diagnosis had she ALSO kept it from the three other siblings. That would have made perfect sense.

A breast cancer patient does not have to tell ANYONE.

But I can’t say this enough: There is no rhyme and reason in leaving one sibling out when you’re not friends with the other three either! That’s the kink in the chain!

In fact, she seems to contact the oldest brother (who’s very wealthy) only when she wants money.

She was in contact with the second brother for a number of years ONLY because he lived nearby her, and it wasn’t close. It was more of a familial-based obligatory thing: invite him over on major holidays.

When he moved out of her state, the contact stopped – ON BOTH ENDS. He now lives near me and our parents. The other two siblings have always lived far from her and our parents.

She has never been in regular contact with the other sister, and they couldn’t be further apart in personality.

Among my two sisters and these two brothers (there’s a third), it’s very accurate to state that there is NO relationship, no cheery and chummy camaraderie, nada, zero, nothing.

And it’s the same with me and this particular sister as well. So why didn’t she tell me of the breast cancer diagnosis? This is why I’m livid.

Tell Two Brothers of a Breast Cancer Diagnosis but Not Both Sisters?

So after I received my sister’s snail mail telling me of this shocking news – 13 months after the diagnosis – I fired back an e-mail calling her on why I was left out of the revelation early on, when she told the three other siblings.

Before you chastise me for not being more sympathetic and instead focusing it more on myself and hence sounding selfish, let me say that the tone of her letter was actually quite high-spirited, including telling me, “Cancer picked the wrong girl.” She said, “I’m doing great!” She expressed no fear of recurrence.

She obviously didn’t need my sympathy. She never even minded the hair loss, though she wore a wig and even prefers to continue wearing it for the convenience despite hair regrowth.

So yes, I felt justified in asking why three siblings were notified early on, including two MEN, when no warm and fuzzy relationship has ever existed with them.

My second brother and I are occasionally over our parents’ house at the same time.

My sister answered that she and my brother feared that I’d “slip” the alarming news to my mother by accident.

I don’t buy this. My brother has always known that I’m the last person to reveal troubling news to our elderly mother, who’s prone to excessively worrying about her kids.

I even once chastised him for telling her he had no medical insurance. When he mildly sprained a knee weightlifting, I warned him not to tell her EVEN THAT.

When I sprained an ankle a few years ago, I warned the third brother — who still does not know of the breast cancer diagnosis — not to tell our mother!

I also admonished this third brother for causing my mother endless sleepless nights — he had told her he lost his job! He could have easily concealed this, as he was living out of state at the time.

So the idea that I come across as someone who might “slip” such devastating news to our mother is totally freaking not believable.

I then asked my second brother about this exclusion. Here’s his explanation:

  • Suppose I was told of the breast cancer diagnosis along with this brother.
  • Sooner or later we’d subsequently be at our parents’ house at the same time.
  • We then might start talking about the diagnosis.
  • My mother might then overhear.

Do you buy that? I sure as hell didn’t, especially since my mother’s hearing is bad!

Everyone knows you can carry on a soft conversation in the same room as her and not be understood!

Besides, if a woman has only ONE sibling to reveal the diagnosis to, out of genuine fear of it getting overheard, don’t you think she should have told only the SISTER?

After all, whose risk of breast cancer soars with a family history: a man’s or a woman’s?

So what would I have done differently had I been told at the get-go?

I would have had a seven-month lead on serial ultrasound screenings (I also have dense breasts and began the serial screenings about six months before my sister’s revelation).

And the honest truth is, I would NEVER have “slipped” the information, and now that I know that my estranged sister was diagnosed with breast cancer, I have NO plans whatsoever of telling our parents.

Lorra Garrick has been covering medical, fitness and cybersecurity topics for many years, having written thousands of articles for print magazines and websites, including as a ghostwriter. She’s also a former ACE-certified personal trainer.  
 
.
Top image: cancer.gov Bruce Wetzel and Harry Schaefer

Treadclimber vs. High Incline Treadmill: Pros, Cons & Benefits

When the Treadclimber is compared to a high incline treadmill, it’s pretty difficult to determine which one actually works better — and then that depends on the user’s goals.

It also depends on how much the user likes the Treadclimber … or the treadmill.

I have spent plenty of time using the Treadclimber, and it’s tough to compare this with a high incline treadmill because both pieces of cardio equipment have their superb virtues.

However, let’s be fair and actually compare the Treadclimber with a standard treadmill.

The Treadclimber is relatively quiet. Whereas, some people slam their feet down so hard on a treadmill that the entire gym can hear it.
 
Also, sometimes the slamming noise is hard to avoid due to an inferior tread belt.

The Treadclimber is easier on the knees and back than the treadmill because the impact is soft, due to this cardio machine’s unique pedal design. Plus, it simulates, to some extent, snow shoeing and sand dune running.

The Treadclimber, despite being gentler on the joints, can yield a tremendous cardio workout – if you don’t cheat by holding onto this machine, that is.

The minute you hold on, you defeat the entire purpose and end up compromising much of the workout.

(The infomercials for the Treadclimber used to show the model holding on for the entire ad, but several years ago, did away with this and now alternate between a model holding on and a model pumping her arms.)

A treadmill, on the other hand, provides opportunity for joint impact if you run on the incline (though not as much as if you ran on a flat grade at the same speed), which isn’t always the terrible thing that it’s made out to be.

High impact cardio strengthens bones and joints, though it’s bad for people who already have problems with their knees and even back.

High impact cardio makes bones denser. Walking a high incline, however, is a low impact activity.

A treadmill is the cardio equipment that most closely simulates actual outdoor ambulation (running, jogging, brisk walking, hill climbing); it’s as close as possible to the real deal.

Running on a treadmill, more so than using a Treadclimber, will bring improvement to athletic performance.

For instance, if you want to improve your basketball conditioning, a treadmill is the far better choice.

If you want to go backwards, it’s easier to do this on a treadmill.

On the other hand, if you want to buff up your agility and neuromuscular coordination, moving backwards on a Treadclimber, without holding on, will really kick in some results.

For people with high levels of conditioning, a treadmill offers better options and more variety, especially since your gym might have a party pooper who tells you it’s against club policy to “run” on a Treadclimber!

I was running on this cardio machine one day (with a jogger’s arm pump) and the manager told me I can’t do this because it might damage the machine.

Despite what some people claim, it’s actually possible to “run” or jog on a Treadclimber. I had done this many times before the manager spotted me.

If you have a hamstring injury or something similar, that makes jogging painful, try running on a Treadclimber – you may find that this is painless, which was one of the reasons I was doing it; at the time I had a hamstring injury.

Both pieces of equipment offer great benefits for cardio conditioning for all levels of exercisers, including people rehabbing injuries.

For best results in your cardio training, use both the Treadclimber and the treadmill; no need to choose.

Lorra Garrick is a former personal trainer certified through the American Council on Exercise. At Bally Total Fitness she trained women and men of all ages for fat loss, muscle building, fitness and improved health. 

Should You Hold Onto a 40 Percent Incline Treadmill to Walk ?

Treadmills that go up to 40 percent incline are getting more popular, but just how high must the incline be before you should hold on while walking?

The TV commercials for the 40 percent incline treadmills show the models walking without holding on, and also while holding on.

The manufacturer wants to appeal to the largest demographic possible.

To show only a hands-off walk would deter potential buyers – who are easily influenced by what they see in commercials — who think they’d fall off without holding on.

I know that sounds really silly, but manufacturers do not want to take a chance on deterring potential buyers, so they show both a hands-off and hands-on demonstration.

So never mind what the TV commercials show.

Let’s look at this from a fitness and mechanical perspective. First off, it’s logical to assume that anyone who’d want to purchase a treadmill for its 40 percent incline is not physically disabled.

That’s a very logical deduction. I can’t imagine a person with multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy or Meniere’s disease wanting to use a 40 percent incline … though anything is possible, for sure!

It’s safe to assume that people who are eager to walk on a 40 percent grade are free of disease or injury that impairs their balance and steadiness.

Should You Hold On When Walking a 40 Percent Incline?

As a former personal trainer at a health club where I worked with many people on their treadmill use, I say NO.

From the standpoint of layperson’s common sense, I also say NO.

It’s quite simple, no PhD in exercise physiology required to understand:

What’s the point of walking on a 40 percent grade if you’re going to hold on, which nullifies the slope effect?

If you hold on, you’ll deprive yourself of the 40 percent incline benefits:

• Works the low back like mad – in a way that deadlifts and yoga do not, though keep doing THOSE too if you already are.

• Provides a way to fire up your heart rate without generating impact – appealing to those whose knees can’t tolerate the impact of jogging.

• Strengthens the ankles.

• Stretches the Achilles tendon and calves.

• Works the glutes more than do lower inclines (though it will NOT make your butt bigger).

• Concentrates more work in the quads than do lower inclines.

• Can prepare your body for steep outdoor hiking.

• Can really get your heart rate up at a slow speed.

• Will improve balance and proprioception.

These benefits will be cancelled out if you hold on. Does the image below make sense?

Holding on in front causes one’s body to angle back, cancelling out the net effect of the incline!

Perhaps you’re wondering if a LIGHT grip won’t make a difference, especially if it’s on the side rails and you’re making an effort to keep your body vertical.

Well, the problem with even a light hold is that it encourages the potential to tighten it – something you may not even be aware of as you get lost in the workout. It also subtracts workload, even if you try to keep vertical.

Why bother holding on at all?

What’s the purpose of a 40 percent grade if you’re going to hold on? This opposes its novelty in the first place.

The rails are there to grab onto in case you start feeling off-balance. Re-steady yourself and then let go.

Swing your arms (you need not exaggerate) as you would if you were climbing a steep hill outdoors.

Conducting 40 percent walking workouts without holding on will give you a true sense of accomplishment, especially if you’ve been leading a sedentary life.

Lorra Garrick is a former personal trainer certified through the American Council on Exercise. At Bally Total Fitness she trained women and men of all ages for fat loss, muscle building, fitness and improved health. 

Why Must Daylight Savings Time Cause Anxiety & Sleep Disruption?

How can a change of just one hour disrupt the sleep of so many people and cause anxiety?

It’s just ONE HOUR, yet throngs of people are thrown into a tizzy over such a seemingly simple change to make! (more…)